Today, I’ll show you a relatively small painting that tells a complicated story. It’s title is “Empty Handed” by Nikolai Solomin, a 73-year-old artist who was extremely successful during the Socialist realism times achieving fame as one of the best propaganda painters. He used to paint huge canvasses glorifying the achievements of the Communist Party. Very false, from both historic and psychological point of view. It was the kind of paintings where all the communists were beautiful, strong, resolute people and all the “enemies of the state” frightened, vicious, and ugly.
But, as the saying goes, “Even a broken clock is right twice a day”. That’s one of those times.
If you’ve been reading me, you know that the first thing we must do to start appreciating a painting is to look at it, scan it, and list things we see. I am not saying the first impression is not important. But the role of the first impression is, in fact, to get you involved in such a way that you’ll keep studying the canvas.
Now, what do we see, overall?
A man was coming from an unsuccessful hunt. He was tired and frustrated because he was coming back empty-handed. It is a fence that marks the territory of his village (it doesn’t have a gate that the fence of his home should have). So, he was very close to his home when he decided to take off his boots, hang his gear on the fence, slump against it and lit a cigarette. This is a cheap brand of cigarettes, so cheap it doesn’t have a filter.
Now, the composition of this painting has a trick that makes it involving.
Yes, you can’t say no to a doggie like that when it asks you to linger, and it is built in a way to make you instantly grasp the plot. The converging lines pointing to the right indicate the very short distance he is yet to cover to his home.
Now, why did the man stop there? Why didn’t he come home, straight? His home is close, he could relax in a more comfortable way there? He’d have to put on all his gear again, the boots, the rifle after this stop. Why!?
Let’s have a closer look at his face, perhaps, it will tell us something?
His flaccid arms do not take any part in his smoking. The cigarette glows in the corner of his mouth, but he doesn’t inhale or exhale the smoke in the way that a smoker should.
How do you think this unlucky hunter feels?
FRUSTRATED. TIRED. But not, actually, tired enough to just drop his gear on the ground. He put it all on the fence in a rather well-organised manner. So, he was not really tired to the extent he couldn’t walk. He sat there not because he had to, but because he needed time to reflect before he confronts the problem of coming home empty-handed.
Everyone knows the feeling. You tried to do something, but failed.
Will this scene be possible in, say, an English-speaking country?
No. You’d come straight home, tell your wife it was an unlucky day, take your gear off, put the rifle back on the wall and enjoy a bath, thinking more about pleasant things awaiting you in the evening.
In Russia, where the roles of men and women are still defined by the old hunter vs.childbearer paradigm, this man failed as a man. It’s not just an unlucky day. It’s a drama. Small-scale, but something to reflect upon, find justification for, analyse and write a novel half the weight of War and Peace.
You may wonder how come reactions to the same situation can be so different in societies standing at roughly the same level of development.
The answer is simple. Linguistics.
In English, frustration is flushed out of the body by one of the two words that take four letters to spell and three sounds to utter.
In Russia, it is a five-letter word, four sounds.
You think, it’s just one sound, one letter! It can’t make the difference!
Remember, the genetic difference between humans and apes is less than 2%.
Here, it’s 20%.
And this is why a Russian painting is often easy to spot: it might be simple, straightforward, and basic in terms of what is shown, but it’s going to be as loaded with messages as an AK47’s magazine is with rounds.
Oh this is excellent. A mini treatise on The Russian Soul. Definitely getting re-blogged!
Even a dedicated disciple of socialist realism can’t avoid noticing – and recording – Russian Soul manifestations ))
we’re more at home
from the demands
for walking through
More at home away from home… so true!
I see this picture in a bit different way. For me the man and the white dog must be looking ‘nowhere’, like horizon or road passing by the house, not home. And the brown dog is looking at us, like we are ‘home’ or this man’s wife. At least if I were him I wouldn’t observe the house after such a day)
Thank you! Alas, Logic stands up against your arguments and refuses to sit 😉
1) we are strangers to the brown dog, otherwise it won’t sit still.
2) the man is looking “inside”, not at something, so it is the white dog that looks at something important for the dog. Dogs do not look “nowhere”, do not reflect on the unjust ways the universe is working along, they look at owners, food, cats and general directions where these things can be found (things more important than a casual passerby).
nooo, I like my way of seing and feeling it more) Who cares about the logic?)) The brown dog is tired and well mannered, the man is looking at some point that makes him rest/not think, it shouldn’t be house, the white dog is so close to him that feels the same)))
All I can say is that no man should stand between an art-lover and her way of seeing )
My logic agrees this time 😉
Love the author and mostly all of his works!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You may like his biggest work: http://tornado-84.livejournal.com/68122.html. I find it a nicely done piece of propaganda 😉
This is very-very old work. By the time it was created due to the political regime in the USSR you either do propaganda works for comission from time to time or do not do any art at all.
you can find newer works here http://batalnaya-m.ru/Solomin.html
and here http://www.gallart.ru/expozition/gallery/78/
Thanks – I’ve seen all these works, some of them live. Most of his church work is just new propaganda. His “other” work is very good in terms of skill, but “gems”, such as the one in this post are rare. I think I’ll do a post on religious paintings by former Soviet propaganda artists. This is a curious phenomenon, worth a closer look. ))
Much like Russian people – simplistic, straightforward, yet loaded with messages. 😉 I totally agree with you about linguistics, though.
Disaster happens when a Russian artist stops being simplistic and straightforward ) I think I need to post a few examples of it someday! Thanks )
Very interesting take on this!
Thank you! And welcome to this blog 😉 It’s great to have you among the readers )